Conrad Black: Why Alberta’s Secession Debate Is a Greater Threat to Canadian Federalism Than Quebec’s

Commentary Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s artful dodge of the latest litigious mischief of the militant indigenous is a welcome move onto the fast track of the devolution of the Canadian Constitution. On May 13, we had the absurd national embarrassment of the indigenous people in Alberta, representing approximately 3.5 percent of the province’s population, gaining a preliminary court judgment that Alberta did not have the right to hold a referendum on the issue of seeking independence from Canada without prior discussion with appropriate First Nations representatives. At the same time, other indigenous elements have challenged the right of the federal, Alberta, and British Columbia governments to build a pipeline to the Pacific for the exportation of Alberta oil and gas....
Conrad Black: Why Alberta’s Secession Debate Is a Greater Threat to Canadian Federalism Than Quebec’s

Conrad Black: Why Alberta’s Secession Debate Is a Greater Threat to Canadian Federalism Than Quebec’s Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s response to recent legal challenges is viewed as a move towards devolving the Canadian Constitution. A court judgment on May 13th indicated that Alberta could not hold an independence referendum without First Nations consultation. Additionally, indigenous groups are contesting the right of governments to construct an oil and gas pipeline to the Pacific.

  • Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s actions are seen as advancing the devolution of the Canadian Constitution.
  • A recent court ruling suggested Alberta needs First Nations consultation before holding an independence referendum.
  • Indigenous groups are challenging the government’s right to build a pipeline for exporting Alberta oil and gas.

Looking for comments…

Searching Nostr relays. This may take a moment the first time this article is opened.