Fourth Turning and Fall of an Empire -Architected Failure
[Welcome Readers. I’m back with something a little different. Over the last several years, it has become obvious to me that the world is encroaching on pivotal times. The lead up to this was not quick. It is not even a unique occurrence; however, for those alive today, it is something they have not seen before. We all feel it. We see it. We try to ignore it. This is my attempt to explain what is going on. Will that help you? I don’t know. More and more people are realizing parts of this every day. My hope is to do my best to communicate the importance of these times, illuminate the root causes, and impart some hope for what will certainly be a tumultuous period for humanity. It has direct ties to the Redacted Science corpus, but there are a lot of levels. Let’s take a look.]
Introduction
This is Part I of a two-part umbrella for a series, The Fourth Turning and Fallen Empire: Architected Failure. Read this for the first half of the spine.
The subject matter is the structure of the argument: two clocks — a civilizational arc and a generational saeculum — intersecting; the mechanisms by which the intersection was accelerated for profit; The class operating the mechanisms; The recognition that the system is ending; and, the exit that is still open.
The disposition: this is not an argument for despair. The diagnosis is severe. The exit is real. The exit requires sustained attention, something the architecture has been engineered to prevent the population from accomplishing. The article is one piece of the rebuilding. The methodology it points to is available to anyone who chooses to use it. The receipts are how the author knows. The receipts are how the reader will know. If you have read other Redacted Science works, here on Substack, on nostr (@JimCraddock), and/or the Redacted Science Research Initiative academic papers online, you know the receipts. If not, you’re going to be surprised.
2. The Two Clocks
Civilizations age on a slow clock. Sir John Bagot Glubb (1897–1986), in The Fate of Empires, traced the pattern across sixteen empires — Assyria through Britain — and found a recurring sequence of phases, terminating in the same set of late-stage symptoms across cases separated by millennia and continents. Ibn Khaldun named the underlying variable in the fourteenth century: asabiyyah, the cohesion that allows a population to coordinate at scale.
Cohesion accumulates over generations as a civilization rises. The opposite of cohesion is polarization. A cohesive society works toward a unified set of goals. A polarized society is marked by infighting and conflict between the growingly differentiated poles. A cohesive society, when diluted, naturally becomes more polarized. Thus, dilution is a natural progression and can be accelerated through social and technological advancement. The very strengths of a society — its social rules and behaviors — can lead to its dilution. Advancing communication allows for more dilution. So do mobility changes and technological acceleration. The civilization is not betraying itself by advancing. The advancement is the mechanism.
Generations age on a fast clock. Strauss and Howe identified the pattern in their work on American history: roughly eighty-year cycles, four generations long, each cycle ending in a Fourth Turning — a crisis phase in which the institutional arrangements built by the prior cycle’s resolution come under stress severe enough to force replacement. The American Revolution. The Civil War. The Depression and the Second World War. Each was a fourth turning. Each was followed by an eighty-year period in which the next four generations grew up progressively more distant from the conditions that produced the crisis. [My great-grandmother was raised by parents that had seen the effects of the Civil War firsthand. She had a rule for the family reunions: no politics. Family first. We forget things.]
3. The Functional Baseline
The cultures that produced functional, long-lived humans across history converged independently on daily physical activity as foundational to human wellbeing.
The Greeks had sōphrosynē — self-discipline, moderation, the virtue of keeping the body functional through consistent physical practice. They had the gymnasium as a civic institution. They understood that the mind and body were not separate systems but one system that had to be maintained through movement.
[Exercise → anandamide → ECS tone normalization → tension load discharge → functional baseline restored. That circuit is present in every human. It was the primary release valve for the ancestral population discussed later. The cultures that survived and thrived codified it as virtue, discipline, training, athletic competition, ritual running, military conditioning, dance. The cultures didn’t need to know the mechanism. They selected for the behavior because the behavior worked.]
They produced the longest-running tradition of human flourishing in written history. It is worth noting that honor was the most crucial virtue in Ancient Greek society, often valued more than life itself.
This is the yardstick. The rest of this article describes the consequences of our forgetting.
4. The Generational Drift
Anyone over fifty has watched the standards move. Not as theory. As the lived experience of being raised differently from how one’s children are being raised, of having had teachers who could enforce a classroom and grandchildren whose teachers cannot, of having grown up in a culture that took for granted certain disciplines that the next culture treated as optional, and the one after that treated as oppressive. The drift is observable. The drift is recent. The drift accelerated in a window most readers can date personally.
[For you that have not reached 50, you still feel it. Plus, you can see it in reruns. You know, too.]
The disciplines that drifted are the ones that mattered. Reading. Paying attention. Doing math with a pencil and paper. Following a multi-step argument across pages without losing the thread. Showing up on time, finishing what was started, accepting correction, apologizing, deferring gratification, and manners. Knowing the names of the local trees and the local birds. Being able to fix what broke. Being able to do hard physical work without injury. Being able to disagree without flinching and to be disagreed with without collapsing. These were not luxuries of a particular class. These were the operational expectations of an ordinary adult one or two generations ago, taught in schools that took teaching them seriously, modeled in homes that took modeling them seriously, reinforced by communities that treated their absence as a problem.
Those traits make you formidable. A difficult target. Losing them makes you sheep.
The transmission failed. Each generation passed less of it to the next. The schools stopped teaching some of it because the funding shifted toward credentials over competence. The homes stopped modeling some of it because both parents went to work to keep up with the cost of living that the prior section’s economic engineering produced. The communities stopped reinforcing it because the communities themselves were dissolved by the same economic forces that emptied the towns and the unions and the civic associations. Each link in the transmission chain weakened in the same window, for related reasons we will explore, on the same schedule.
Particular disciplines, named above, that previously transmitted reliably across generations have stopped transmitting reliably. The stopping is documentable in test scores, in fitness benchmarks, in attention metrics, in the qualitative reports of every teacher, coach, and trainer who has worked with successive cohorts of young adults across the last forty years. The data say what the lived observation says. These are real measurements.
The drift produced something worse than incompetence. It produced polarization. Cohesion runs on shared equilibrium — the accumulated, generations-long negotiation of what counts as normal, expected, admirable, embarrassing, honorable, and appropriate. Demands for rapid replacement of the equilibrium, no matter the source, do not request accommodation within the existing frame. They request that the frame itself yield. If you push on it hard enough, it breaks.
[Sheep don’t push, they are led. WHO are their shepherds??]
5. Dilution
What §4 described is one specific case of a pattern Glubb traced across sixteen empires and Ibn Khaldun named seven hundred years ago. Civilizations dilute. Cohesion accumulates over generations of shared sacrifice and shared building, and dilutes over generations of comfort, scale, and forgetting. The dilution is not a moral failing of any particular generation. It is what happens when the conditions that produced cohesion are absent for long enough that the cohesion has nothing left to maintain it. [Then forget]
Society is a system. It has functions, controllers, constants, and variables. Ideally, that is a system running in steady-state, a balanced equilibria. In reality, it is always in flux, in the same way your system is always in flux with chemical reactions down to the intracellular level. Each new generation, or phase, brings with it differences, perturbations, that the previous and next generation experience differently. A key variable is the transmission rate of knowledge of the previous system to the next generation. Dilution can be cohesive if this variable is kept high. When it falls below a threshold, for any reason, from any cause, the civilization dilutes. The dilution feeds back into the equation, resulting in an even faster decay. This then is not a matter of whom, but of maintaining society. [Guilty Party #1 - everyone]
This distinction is what Glubb saw across his sixteen cases and what Ibn Khaldun named in the fourteenth century. Late-stage civilizations characteristically lose transmission rate from within before they fail externally.
The framework that this article’s larger corpus develops adds a biological dimension to the cultural one Glubb described. Homo sapiens is not a static classification. The species lives on a spectrum defined by multiple biological axes, each of which involves an organism that science has largely forgotten — an organism that science itself first identified over a century ago, examined seriously in the mid-twentieth century, and then walked away from. [And there it is. Guilt laid bare and the surprise to some of you who may be new to Redacted Science. More Later. Read the articles. Read the academic papers and Case study. Read on.]
6. The Economic Engineering Arc
What follows is one continuous engineering project, not a sequence of unrelated dysfunctions. It begins in 1910, on an island, and it is still running. Each piece of it is documented in public sources. None of it requires inference. The architecture is built. The receipts were left where they fell because the people who built it did not expect anyone capable of reading them to bother. [It is all quite real and open and theft]
6a. The founding.
In November 1910, six men traveled in a private railcar to Jekyll Island off the coast of Georgia, under cover of a duck-hunting trip, to draft the legislation that would become the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. The participants were Senator Nelson Aldrich, Treasury official A. Piatt Andrew, and four representatives of the largest American banking houses: Frank Vanderlip of National City Bank, Henry Davison and Benjamin Strong of J.P. Morgan, and Paul Warburg of Kuhn, Loeb. The cover was deemed necessary because the meeting could not survive public knowledge: a private central bank designed in secret by the largest private banks could not be sold to Congress as public-interest reform if the public knew who had designed it.
Once the Federal Reserve was entrenched, the participants began writing about the meeting in their own memoirs. Vanderlip described it in 1935 in The Saturday Evening Post and again in his 1935 autobiography From Farm Boy to Financier. Warburg’s papers documented his role. The historical record is not contested. The founders themselves told the story, in print, under their own names, because by the time they told it the system was so entrenched that the admission carried no consequence. That is the founding receipt. It exists because the founders were confident enough to leave it. [And most people still have no idea… I hope knowledge of my work will carry forward better. Yes, that’s why I’m writing this, so you understand both not just one]
The architecture they designed routed money creation through a private banking consortium operating under a public charter. Profits to the member banks. Losses to the public balance sheet. The Federal Reserve was sold to Congress as a stabilizing reform that would prevent the banking panics of the prior era. It has presided over every major banking crisis since.
6b. The operating principle, demonstrated.
Socialized losses, privatized gains. The phrase compresses what the architecture actually does into four words. Every banking crisis since 1913 has resolved in the same shape: private institutions take risks that produce private gains in the upswing and public losses in the collapse. Each event resolved through a transfer of losses from the institutions that incurred them to the public balance sheet that absorbed them. [“The Rich Get Richer”]
The “Great Financial Crisis” of 2008 case is the load-bearing example because every adult reader lived through it. Major financial institutions made bets on mortgage-backed securities that produced enormous private profits in the years preceding the collapse. Executive compensation at those institutions hit historical peaks during the years the bets were being made. When the bets failed, the institutions were declared too big to fail, and the public balance sheet absorbed the losses through direct bailouts, Federal Reserve asset purchases, and monetary expansion that transferred wealth from holders of dollars to holders of assets. The executives who oversaw the failing institutions kept their compensation packages. None went to prison. The institutions emerged from the crisis larger and more concentrated than they had been before. The architecture worked exactly as designed. The public called it a failure. The founders, if they had still been alive, would have called it a success. [Guilty Party #2 -The Banks]
6c. The technical mechanism.
The mechanism by which the architecture extracts at scale operates through three named effects. The Triffin dilemma, identified by economist Robert Triffin in 1960, demonstrates that a country whose currency serves as the global reserve must run persistent trade deficits to supply the world with that currency. Persistent trade deficits hollow out domestic manufacturing because foreign producers undercut domestic ones at the exchange rate the reserve role requires. Hollowed manufacturing removes the production base that supported the twentieth-century American middle class. What replaces it is financialization — an economy in which a shrinking real-production sector supports a growing claims-on-production sector, with the claims concentrated in the hands of those closest to the financial machinery. [Just more basic math in another system]
The Cantillon effect, named after eighteenth-century economist Richard Cantillon, describes who benefits from new money creation. When new money enters the economy, those closest to the point of creation receive it at its prior purchasing power and spend it before prices adjust. Those further from the creation receive the money later, at reduced purchasing power, after prices have already absorbed the expansion. [Basically, they get it first, how much do you think they want to give up? As little as possible]
Reserve currency status compounds both effects. When we print money out of thin air, every holder of a dollar loses value. It is a capital siphon, attacking the substrate of virtually everyone on the planet with those closest to the money printer leaching societal ATP for personal gain.
6d Governmental Failure
As even the honorable fall to greed, the very leaders of the country fall prey to manipulation of the economic environment. Intellectuals in good faith lose traction to special interests. The conglomeration of money begins to eat at the very foundations of the system. Wars are profitable. Justifying a war might seem a difficult exercise, but that has not proven true in real life. Huge amounts of money are borrowed, spent, and end up in the hands of a very select group. Good men die so that others can profit. [Captain Randall J Craddock, pilot, B-52 Stratofortress was shot down in a broken plane flying last in formation through a pass with known SAM installations during Operation Linebacker II].
Ultimately, this guilt lies on the government, not the companies. The institution failed, regardless of who caused it. [Guilty Party #3, the Government and Intelligence Services]
6e The forcing function.
Through the 1970s and most of the 1980s, executive pay was predominantly cash salary, with modest bonuses and limited equity components. CEO-to-worker pay ratios in that period ran in the range of 20-to-1 to 40-to-1, comparable to ratios in other developed economies and consistent with the historical American norm. [But we forget, sometimes, remember?]
The shift was engineered. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, added by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, capped the corporate tax deductibility of executive compensation at one million dollars per executive — unless the compensation above that threshold was classified as performance-based. Stock options were specifically defined as performance-based and therefore exempt from the cap. The provision was sold publicly as a measure to limit runaway executive pay. The actual effect was to make any compensation committee that wanted to maximize after-tax executive compensation route packages away from cash salary and toward stock options, because cash above the million-dollar threshold became non-deductible while options above the threshold remained fully deductible.
The compensation curve responded immediately. Equity components surged through the 1990s. Options dominated executive packages by the end of the decade. CEO-to-worker pay ratios crossed 200-to-1 and kept climbing, peaking near 350-to-1 in some sectors and remaining in the 200-300 range for major corporations since. The geometric returns the executive class now demands from the system are not a natural feature of capitalism. They are an artifact of a 1993 tax provision marketed as reform. Once executives tasted that level of elite pay, there was no going back. [Guilty party #4, Corporations]
When the underlying real economy cannot produce those returns honestly, the levers get pulled harder. Quantitative easing. Stock buybacks funded by corporate debt. Asset price inflation as a substitute for wage growth. Each lever pull buys time at the cost of long-term system stability. The bill is paid by every metric the article has been tracking — declining real wages, declining homeownership rates, declining fertility, declining institutional trust, the rise of dual income families, declining cohesion and everything that depends on a normal middle class continuing to exist.
The math does not work for everyone else because it cannot. This is extraction of value from the working class into the elite class. That has a finite limit. [Basic math again, right?]
6f. The delivery system.
The government overspent, so it abandoned hard money. The Banks and the Corporations worked other magic, too. In 1978, laws created 401k plans. Companies rapidly offloaded liabilities on their balance sheet, placing the burden of retirement on the worker. The workers learned that equity returns outpaces others, so they funneled their savings into the financial system.
The major American equity indices — the S&P 500, the Nasdaq 100, the Russell 1000 — are weighted by market capitalization. Larger companies receive larger weightings. Passive index funds replicate the weightings mechanically: every dollar that flows into an S&P 500 index fund is allocated to the 500 constituent companies in proportion to their existing market caps. The fund manager makes no decisions. The effect is reflexive. As the largest companies receive disproportionate flows, their stock prices rise. As their prices rise, their market capitalizations rise. As their capitalizations rise, their index weightings rise. The largest index providers — BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street — collectively hold voting control over substantial percentages of the largest American corporations, not because they chose to acquire those positions but because the flows accumulate there mechanically.
That system grew immensely, encountering its own cycles as new financialized products were conceived and utilized. The retail investor received market returns. The executive received geometric ones.
Every system started at a baseline. Every bailout was a catalyst in the reaction chamber. Each time the system started to fail from another limit being reached, the system recalibrated, pulling on yet more substrate. From the outside, the system is working as expected. On the inside, barriers fall, and ground is given.
7. Campaign Finance
If you give elected officials the opportunity to change the laws to benefit their position and honor has been forsaken, the obvious conclusion is that they will take advantage of that position.
A series of laws and court rulings created the current situation where anyone can give as much money as they would like to an election campaign. Yes, there are individual limits, but those numbers are for the uninformed. A billionaire can give billions to SuperPACs. Technically, a SuperPAC cannot donate directly to or coordinate directly with candidates, but they can saturate the airwaves with messaging. If all someone hears is a specific message, the truth is irrelevant. The decline in education serves the messaging. The shepherds lead the flock wherever they want to take them.
The money gathered by the banks and corporations was more than enough to change the game forever.
The operating model is the pro-sports draft, run in reverse. In professional sports, teams pay for talent, the talent is contractually obligated to perform, and the performance is measured on the field where everyone can see it. Politics ran the same operation but inverted the visibility. The talent — the candidate — was selected by donors before voters knew there was a race. Money flowed to viable candidates eighteen to twenty-four months before the first primary. The candidate spends most of their working hours not with constituents but with donors, on the phone, building the relationships that fund the next campaign. The constituents get the jersey ceremony. The donors get the player.
Once the price of an official is set by market mechanisms, the price discovers its level. A House seat that used to cost a few thousand dollars and a lot of door-knocking now runs eight figures in competitive districts. A Senate seat runs nine figures. The presidency runs ten. At those prices, the candidate cannot be the product — the candidate is the vehicle through which the donor class purchases the policy outputs the donor class wants. The architecture is closed. The voter’s role has been reduced to ratifying a selection that was made before the voter was consulted.
While many people see this at the national level, not as many realize it has reached every level of governmental office. The same logic that legalized unlimited federal-level spending propagated, through state-level constitutional challenges and federal preemption, to every level of American governance. School board races, county commission races, mayoral races, state legislative races — every level of government became legally available for purchase, at smaller prices, with even less press scrutiny than the federal level.
The concentration of wealth in the top .1% creates a situation where every official is for sale. The math makes it impossible for the average informed voter to have any real impact. Being informed is not relevant. How much money you have is the relevant measurement.
8. Institutional Capture
The political system was purchased first. Everything else followed. The institutions that should have constrained the architecture from outside the political system — the medical establishment, the academic establishment, the press — were the next purchases, and the prices were lower because each institution had already developed its own internal credentialing class whose interests aligned with the architecture’s. The captures were not coups. The capture happened because there was nothing structural left to prevent it.
[And Here Ends Part I. The next part is written, but I am compressing it. But, here’s a spoiler:
Open peer review exists. Preprint servers exist. Post-publication review exists.
[A Note from the Architect - Dang, I was typing along and ran into that line and thought, um. Sure. So, here’s the deal. Bring your reviews of my papers. They are openly available. I will respond while I can. Tick-Tock. If you are going to fuss over format, please spare me. Those are social rules that I declined due to 60 years of proven scientific redaction. I have a large number of testable points all outlined. Test them or bring other scientific evidence that disputes what I assert. Your move.]
Loading comments…